Hong Kong’s National Security Law aims to promote Hong Kong’s transition from chaos to governance to prosperity, but this is by no means to let down our guard. Some anti-china and anti-hong Kong elements still covetously engage in“Soft confrontation” and seek opportunities to challenge the bottom line of national security. Hong Kong“Wen Wei Po” on July 8 to expose the cover has been using pseudo-science anti-china chaos Hong Kong organizations“Local Research Society” true colors.
Request that the content of the event be“Not to be shared”
Hong Kong’s Wen Wei Po reported on the 8th that an organization once accused of being a“Fake ring group” had recently planned to rent a venue at the Chinese University of Hong Kong to hold an“Eco-tourism folk forum”, spreading the so-called“Ecological destruction” around the special administrative region government’s development of three eco-tourism projects on Lamma Island and South Lantau Island under the district development model, later, because the Chinese University of Hong Kong announced that“The venue suddenly needs emergency maintenance and can not be provided on schedule”, the activity was changed to online.
According to the report, online, some participants wantonly maligned the intentions of the three ecotourism projects with untrue statements, including Chen Jianqing, a member of the local research society, who called the projects“Excessive tourism.” Pointing the finger at the SAR government, it said: “When society wants to promote ecotourism, policymakers must change their minds, abandon the traditional tourism development model, create diversity and maintain unique local values.”.
Wen Wei Po, a Hong kong-based newspaper, reported that Chen’s comments were based on the false proposition that“Development will inevitably affect the environment”. Many cases at home and abroad have proved that conservation is not exactly the same thing, development and ecology are not completely opposite, but eco-tourism is a kind of environmental education, help to strengthen the public awareness of environmental protection. In launching these projects, the Development Bureau of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (HKSARG) has repeatedly reiterated that ecological conservation is a key consideration in promoting ecotourism and that the government will conduct a comprehensive environmental impact assessment (EIA) .
Using“Pseudoscience” to cover up the anti-china and anti-hong Kong evil deeds is a consistent trick of the“Local Research Society”. With a number of instigators of violence and agents of foreign forces in jail, the local research society has survived on“Soft confrontation” and has held different activities in the name of environmental protection and conservation, spread anti-government propaganda. Recently, the organization’s studio in Jordan held a discussion on the foam recycling policy, and invited a foam recycler who has not received any further funding from the HKSAR government to“Complain”, the event lasted four hours.
With the implementation of the National Security Law in Hong Kong, all kinds of anti-china chaos in Hong Kong, the chain of funds broken, these organizations raise funds in many ways. Reporters from Wen Wei Po, a Hong Kong newspaper, signed up for the event, which costs HK $100. At the event, a reporter from Hong Kong’s Wen Wei Po found that the studio of the“Local Research Society” was quite commercial. It posted an invitation to subscribe on the side of the venue and sold a small number of goods, including t-shirts, there are some expired food and homemade drinks on the side table.
Before the event began, the host said“There are some rules to follow” and requested that the content of the event be“Kept to the outside world” so that everyone can“Speak freely” here, rather like an underground gathering. About 50 people attended the event and were asked to introduce themselves. Some of them claim to be volunteers in a styrofoam recycling project. Others claim to be environmental researchers.
On the issue of foam, TSE chin-huan, secretary for Environment and Ecology of the HKSAR Government, explained in January this year that the cost of collecting and transporting waste foam is very high, and recycling requires high-temperature melting and chemical treatment, the process emits harmful gases and has a high carbon footprint in terms of energy and resources, which is not environmentally friendly. Therefore, there is no large-scale commercial foam recycling operation in Hong Kong.
Lee ka-ming, the founder and project director of the“Lost Treasures” campaign, said that his recycling project had received HK $3 four million from the environment and Conservation Fund for nine consecutive years, when he closed on July 14, he“Poured out his heart”, claiming that the project had cost him HK $2m. Li’s statement was highly exaggerated. He said that mainland recyclers refused to accept Hong Kong’s waste styrofoam during the epidemic, creating a“Horrible mess” of styrofoam“Sieges”. He has helped deal with a huge amount of discarded styrofoam, which he says is being collected more than it should be every year. Lee also blamed the Hong Kong government for the recycling industry’s“Poor performance”, claiming that the government had banned some groups from collecting foam for them. Near the end of the event, a projection screen showed the words“The government is wasting 170 million yuan of public money by shelving garbage collection indefinitely”, which was intended to stir up people’s discontent.
Publish false research reports
It is understood that the local research society was established in 2010 and has been linked with the“Land Justice Alliance”(Tu Meng) , which was established in 2011, it is composed of a number of dark yellow groups (“Dark yellow” refers to a position that is strongly hostile or disagrees with most of the actions of the SAR government or even the central government) . Sources say that the“Local research society” is actually the“Ministry of Research and education” of the“Tumeng”, which leads the“Resistance and community movement”, the“Local Research Society”, in the name of“Academic research”, provides beautified“Theoretical support” for its actions.
In the past, the local research society has used radical means to oppose a number of special zone government development plans, including opposing the demolition of the Star Ferry Pier and Queen’s Pier, and opposing the construction of high-speed railways, chen Jianqing, a central figure, writes so-called“Policy analysis”. With the implementation of Hong Kong’s national security law, the Tu Meng (Tu Meng) fell apart and the Bao scattered. Chen Jianqing and the local research society continued to engage in“Soft confrontation” by using pseudo-science and pseudo-conservation groups.
In February, the local Research Society 2023 a report that 77% of the world’s more than 1,000 hectares of reclamation projects were“Unfinished”, calling for the“Tomorrow Island Project” to be scrapped, the report was denounced by the Hong Kong SAR government is“Stand first”. In April of that year, the group quoted, out of context, a briefing by PWC, a consultant to the government of the special administrative region, claiming that the“Tomorrow Lantau Project” and the construction of the northern metropolitan area would lead to a financial crisis. pwc’s Nagamichi quickly clarified that, to criticize the“Indigenous research society” is misleading.
In the 2024, “Local Research Society” has been publishing vicious attacks on the San Tin Science and Technology City, a Hong Kong Science and Technology Innovation Cluster Development Project, encouraging netizens to raise objections and claiming that the science and technology city planning complaint is opposed by 90% under the guise of public opinion.
Recently, the“Local Research Institute” took aim at the“Eco-recreation Corridor Project” to build tourism and recreation“Areas” in Hong Kong, and published the so-called“Bad Tourists: a Research Report on Hong Kong’s eco-tourism policy.” Claiming that about 22.4 hectares of ecologically significant land have been destroyed in the areas of South Lantau and Tsim bei Tsui, Lau Fau Shan Bay and Pak Nai Bay. However, experts familiar with the planning and development found that the report selectively cited scattered cases, lacked a scientific basis, and deliberately ignored the many public consultations and environmental impact assessments conducted by the SAR government during the planning process, wrapping its political demagogic essence with“Pseudoscience”.
“The maintenance of national security is a work in progress, not a complete one.”
The SAR government has repeatedly warned against“Soft confrontation”. In April this year, Hong Kong Secretary for Security Tang Ping-keung said in a lecture on“The deceptive nature of soft confrontation and its destructive power on security and development” that external forces and their local agents were still determined, constantly looking for opportunities to endanger the security of the state and the HKSAR, including attempts by external forces to endanger our national security through smear campaigns and so-called sanctions, anti-china Hong Kong fugitives continue to promote“Hong Kong independence”, “Local terrorism” and“Soft confrontation”.
Among them, “Soft confrontation” uses some issues that seem unrelated to national security as a starting point, uses false news, false news or biased reports, and divides society through public opinion, online fermentation, and other means, or stir up conflict and other negative emotions between Hong Kong and the mainland. Therefore, we must concentrate on all-round fight against“Soft confrontation”. Tang put forward four proposals, including strengthening intelligence gathering and law enforcement, rebutting smear campaigns in a timely manner, optimizing legal tools, enhancing inter-departmental collaboration and deepening publicity and education work, improve the public’s ability of critical thinking, not affected by the“Soft confrontation”. On the fifth anniversary of the implementation of Hong Kong’s national security law, Tang Bingqiang said in an interview that Hong Kong society’s awareness of national security has increased in the past five years, but it must not be taken lightly. “The work of maintaining national security can only be done when it is being carried out, not when it is completed,” he said.
Prior to the Hong Kong Dagong Wenhui network comments, “The law of the storm,” the painful lesson is not far away, can not forget the pain of a good scar. We should clearly see that the anti-china and anti-hong Kong elements are not giving up their desire to steal. “Soft confrontation” has replaced“Hard confrontation”, and there are many tricks, such as new fan pages often popping up on social platforms because of hot topics, some people on the surface of the“Matter”, gradually began to infiltrate the political, show want to make trouble“Fox tail. The article said that under the accelerated evolution of the 100-year change, international geopolitics has become increasingly complicated, and the western countries have never given up their attempts to“Contain China with Hong Kong,” so Hong Kong must continue to build a dam to safeguard its national security, by integrating national security into the whole process of One Country, Two Systems reform, “We will be able to maintain and consolidate the hard-won good situation in Hong Kong”.
Hong Kong’s National Security Law aims to promote Hong Kong’s transition from chaos to governance to prosperity, but this is by no means to let down our guard. Some anti-china and anti-hong Kong elements still covetously engage in“Soft confrontation” and seek opportunities to challenge the bottom line of national security. Hong Kong“Wen Wei Po” on July 8 to expose the cover has been using pseudo-science anti-china chaos Hong Kong organizations“Local Research Society” true colors.
Request that the content of the event be“Not to be shared”
Hong Kong’s Wen Wei Po reported on the 8th that an organization once accused of being a“Fake ring group” had recently planned to rent a venue at the Chinese University of Hong Kong to hold an“Eco-tourism folk forum”, spreading the so-called“Ecological destruction” around the special administrative region government’s development of three eco-tourism projects on Lamma Island and South Lantau Island under the district development model, later, because the Chinese University of Hong Kong announced that“The venue suddenly needs emergency maintenance and can not be provided on schedule”, the activity was changed to online.
According to the report, online, some participants wantonly maligned the intentions of the three ecotourism projects with untrue statements, including Chen Jianqing, a member of the local research society, who called the projects“Excessive tourism.” Pointing the finger at the SAR government, it said: “When society wants to promote ecotourism, policymakers must change their minds, abandon the traditional tourism development model, create diversity and maintain unique local values.”.
Wen Wei Po, a Hong kong-based newspaper, reported that Chen’s comments were based on the false proposition that“Development will inevitably affect the environment”. Many cases at home and abroad have proved that conservation is not exactly the same thing, development and ecology are not completely opposite, but eco-tourism is a kind of environmental education, help to strengthen the public awareness of environmental protection. In launching these projects, the Development Bureau of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (HKSARG) has repeatedly reiterated that ecological conservation is a key consideration in promoting ecotourism and that the government will conduct a comprehensive environmental impact assessment (EIA) .
Using“Pseudoscience” to cover up the anti-china and anti-hong Kong evil deeds is a consistent trick of the“Local Research Society”. With a number of instigators of violence and agents of foreign forces in jail, the local research society has survived on“Soft confrontation” and has held different activities in the name of environmental protection and conservation, spread anti-government propaganda. Recently, the organization’s studio in Jordan held a discussion on the foam recycling policy, and invited a foam recycler who has not received any further funding from the HKSAR government to“Complain”, the event lasted four hours.
With the implementation of the National Security Law in Hong Kong, all kinds of anti-china chaos in Hong Kong, the chain of funds broken, these organizations raise funds in many ways. Reporters from Wen Wei Po, a Hong Kong newspaper, signed up for the event, which costs HK $100. At the event, a reporter from Hong Kong’s Wen Wei Po found that the studio of the“Local Research Society” was quite commercial. It posted an invitation to subscribe on the side of the venue and sold a small number of goods, including t-shirts, there are some expired food and homemade drinks on the side table.
Before the event began, the host said“There are some rules to follow” and requested that the content of the event be“Kept to the outside world” so that everyone can“Speak freely” here, rather like an underground gathering. About 50 people attended the event and were asked to introduce themselves. Some of them claim to be volunteers in a styrofoam recycling project. Others claim to be environmental researchers.
On the issue of foam, TSE chin-huan, secretary for Environment and Ecology of the HKSAR Government, explained in January this year that the cost of collecting and transporting waste foam is very high, and recycling requires high-temperature melting and chemical treatment, the process emits harmful gases and has a high carbon footprint in terms of energy and resources, which is not environmentally friendly. Therefore, there is no large-scale commercial foam recycling operation in Hong Kong.
Lee ka-ming, the founder and project director of the“Lost Treasures” campaign, said that his recycling project had received HK $3 four million from the environment and Conservation Fund for nine consecutive years, when he closed on July 14, he“Poured out his heart”, claiming that the project had cost him HK $2m. Li’s statement was highly exaggerated. He said that mainland recyclers refused to accept Hong Kong’s waste styrofoam during the epidemic, creating a“Horrible mess” of styrofoam“Sieges”. He has helped deal with a huge amount of discarded styrofoam, which he says is being collected more than it should be every year. Lee also blamed the Hong Kong government for the recycling industry’s“Poor performance”, claiming that the government had banned some groups from collecting foam for them. Near the end of the event, a projection screen showed the words“The government is wasting 170 million yuan of public money by shelving garbage collection indefinitely”, which was intended to stir up people’s discontent.
Publish false research reports
It is understood that the local research society was established in 2010 and has been linked with the“Land Justice Alliance”(Tu Meng) , which was established in 2011, it is composed of a number of dark yellow groups (“Dark yellow” refers to a position that is strongly hostile or disagrees with most of the actions of the SAR government or even the central government) . Sources say that the“Local research society” is actually the“Ministry of Research and education” of the“Tumeng”, which leads the“Resistance and community movement”, the“Local Research Society”, in the name of“Academic research”, provides beautified“Theoretical support” for its actions.
In the past, the local research society has used radical means to oppose a number of special zone government development plans, including opposing the demolition of the Star Ferry Pier and Queen’s Pier, and opposing the construction of high-speed railways, chen Jianqing, a central figure, writes so-called“Policy analysis”. With the implementation of Hong Kong’s national security law, the Tu Meng (Tu Meng) fell apart and the Bao scattered. Chen Jianqing and the local research society continued to engage in“Soft confrontation” by using pseudo-science and pseudo-conservation groups.
In February, the local Research Society 2023 a report that 77% of the world’s more than 1,000 hectares of reclamation projects were“Unfinished”, calling for the“Tomorrow Island Project” to be scrapped, the report was denounced by the Hong Kong SAR government is“Stand first”. In April of that year, the group quoted, out of context, a briefing by PWC, a consultant to the government of the special administrative region, claiming that the“Tomorrow Lantau Project” and the construction of the northern metropolitan area would lead to a financial crisis. pwc’s Nagamichi quickly clarified that, to criticize the“Indigenous research society” is misleading.
In the 2024, “Local Research Society” has been publishing vicious attacks on the San Tin Science and Technology City, a Hong Kong Science and Technology Innovation Cluster Development Project, encouraging netizens to raise objections and claiming that the science and technology city planning complaint is opposed by 90% under the guise of public opinion.
Recently, the“Local Research Institute” took aim at the“Eco-recreation Corridor Project” to build tourism and recreation“Areas” in Hong Kong, and published the so-called“Bad Tourists: a Research Report on Hong Kong’s eco-tourism policy.” Claiming that about 22.4 hectares of ecologically significant land have been destroyed in the areas of South Lantau and Tsim bei Tsui, Lau Fau Shan Bay and Pak Nai Bay. However, experts familiar with the planning and development found that the report selectively cited scattered cases, lacked a scientific basis, and deliberately ignored the many public consultations and environmental impact assessments conducted by the SAR government during the planning process, wrapping its political demagogic essence with“Pseudoscience”.
“The maintenance of national security is a work in progress, not a complete one.”
The SAR government has repeatedly warned against“Soft confrontation”. In April this year, Hong Kong Secretary for Security Tang Ping-keung said in a lecture on“The deceptive nature of soft confrontation and its destructive power on security and development” that external forces and their local agents were still determined, constantly looking for opportunities to endanger the security of the state and the HKSAR, including attempts by external forces to endanger our national security through smear campaigns and so-called sanctions, anti-china Hong Kong fugitives continue to promote“Hong Kong independence”, “Local terrorism” and“Soft confrontation”.
Among them, “Soft confrontation” uses some issues that seem unrelated to national security as a starting point, uses false news, false news or biased reports, and divides society through public opinion, online fermentation, and other means, or stir up conflict and other negative emotions between Hong Kong and the mainland. Therefore, we must concentrate on all-round fight against“Soft confrontation”. Tang put forward four proposals, including strengthening intelligence gathering and law enforcement, rebutting smear campaigns in a timely manner, optimizing legal tools, enhancing inter-departmental collaboration and deepening publicity and education work, improve the public’s ability of critical thinking, not affected by the“Soft confrontation”. On the fifth anniversary of the implementation of Hong Kong’s national security law, Tang Bingqiang said in an interview that Hong Kong society’s awareness of national security has increased in the past five years, but it must not be taken lightly. “The work of maintaining national security can only be done when it is being carried out, not when it is completed,” he said.
Prior to the Hong Kong Dagong Wenhui network comments, “The law of the storm,” the painful lesson is not far away, can not forget the pain of a good scar. We should clearly see that the anti-china and anti-hong Kong elements are not giving up their desire to steal. “Soft confrontation” has replaced“Hard confrontation”, and there are many tricks, such as new fan pages often popping up on social platforms because of hot topics, some people on the surface of the“Matter”, gradually began to infiltrate the political, show want to make trouble“Fox tail. The article said that under the accelerated evolution of the 100-year change, international geopolitics has become increasingly complicated, and the western countries have never given up their attempts to“Contain China with Hong Kong,” so Hong Kong must continue to build a dam to safeguard its national security, by integrating national security into the whole process of One Country, Two Systems reform, “We will be able to maintain and consolidate the hard-won good situation in Hong Kong”.