The United States uses different attitudes and means to deal with different adversaries. Against its ally, Denmark, it has seized a soft target; against the Houthis, it has been beaten without a word.
On the evening of January 11, local time, the Houthis issued an important statement: within the past 24 hours, there was a fresh round of missile and drone strikes on the USS Harry S. Truman north of the Red Sea, which lasted nine hours.
I
t was the fifth time the Houthis had attacked the Truman since it arrived in the Red Sea, again in support of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. At the same time, Houthi armed side also said that Israel and its allies will carry out more military operations, until Israel stops any aggression and blockade of the Gaza Strip.
This is really tough, as long as you don’t stop, we will go all the way.
The Truman has now moved to the Suez Canal north of the Red Sea and is likely to escape to the Mediterranean via the Suez Canal. For the United States, of course, this is not an escape, but a”Triumphant advance in the opposite direction.”. There was no comment from the US side on the news that the aircraft carrier had been punched. It’s not that they don’t want to respond, it’s that they can’t. The presence of the Houthis is something the U. S. military can do nothing about. Now the United States, has been unable and unable to penetrate the battlefield in the Middle East, can only do superficial efforts. The Houthis attack round after round, and though their forces are not that strong, once or twice, twice or three, ten, twenty, fifty times… … one bombing, the ns lose face, and the Houthis win. However, at present, it seems that the Houthis didn’t blow up just once, but the military has a thick skin, ah, and even if they killed them, they wouldn’t say.
The United States has said a lot about its deafness to the attack, and it has clearly caved in. But compare that with America’s attitude to its ally Denmark. Since Donald Trump made a statement in the media two days ago that he would not rule out seizing Greenland by force, the American media has also been making a lot of noise, politico even ran an article claiming that Donald Trump’s war to annex Greenland would be the shortest in world history. The article begins with a reference to the 1951 bilateral defense agreement between the United States and Denmark, under which the United States pledged to protect Greenland from attack. But the irony is that after 74 years, the promise-makers are going to attack. Citing NATO figures, the report described the gap between the two countries in terms of military size and spending, and even compared the war that didn’t happen to Davy against the giant Goglia.
Politico also poked fun at Denmark, suggesting that Denmark get a good lawyer this morning, perhaps with some hope. It is clear that Denmark is no match for the United States in terms of multiples of its strength, and that they are truly powerless in the face of American ridicule. According to NATO’s own figures, Denmark has spent $8.9 billion in the war in Russia and Ukraine to aid the U. s.-backed country. Whether actively or passively, Denmark has been”Pouring its heart out” for its ally, the United States, at the cost of everything. But instead of getting anything in return, Denmark has brought home a hungry wolf. The U. S. Grinds Denmark to the ground and doesn’t give them any love. The irony isn’t entirely misplaced. Almost all of Europe’s most sophisticated weaponry is made in the U.S. . It’s OK to scare the good guys, but not so much the real robbers. As long as the United States is in a bad mood and controls the”Back door” of these weapons, is this war still necessary?
If Donald Trump really wants to”Take Greenland by force”, the best thing the Danes can do is to surrender their father early on, because they can live with themselves if they don’t. This is America’s”Special favour” to its ally, which might otherwise have suffered. In fact, although the NATO group as a whole, but the United States has such a big brother, would like to no cracks are impossible. By the time Donald Trump came to power, the United States had indeed begun to take action on Greenland, the Panama Canal, Canada, and so on, and the demise of the NATO group was in doubt. Allies will attack each other, then the formation of this”Alliance” what is the point? The conflict between Russia and Ukraine was provoked by the US. For three years, only the US has been left in ruins, flush with cash. The Americans are taking the”Blood” of their allies for their own economic”Life”, you do not give that I live Rob, play do not play.
In the past these problems can be tolerated, give big brother a point for it is also deserved. But now it is no longer just about offering offerings; it is about territorial sovereignty. The trust among member countries is being consumed little by little, and sooner or later it will be exhausted. The U. S. has gone soft on the Houthis, but hit its allies hard. The track of the Truman was not to be deceived; it was heading north, and could not easily venture further south. The U. S. is taking it out on its allies like Denmark, as if that will allow it to remain the hegemon. Through the ages, any war will be justified before it breaks out. But the U.S. apparently can’t wait any longer. It doesn’t even want to make excuses like”Strengthening Greenland’s defense against the Russian threat.” Demolish all the”Memorial archways” they had erected before.
The Danish response to Donald Trump’s declaration that it would not rule out the armed annexation of Greenland was to earmark $1.5 bn for the island’s defence. Compared with the previous 8.9 billion U. S. aid to Ukraine, it can be seen that the U. S. gnawed Denmark, only”Skinny.”. On the one hand, the United States put up with it, on the other hand, the United States showed what is called bullying. “Paper tiger” title, as expected, is not a random play. Image from the web