{"id":6757,"date":"2025-09-12T01:38:59","date_gmt":"2025-09-12T01:38:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/?p=6757"},"modified":"2025-09-12T01:38:59","modified_gmt":"2025-09-12T01:38:59","slug":"over-the-past-two-centuries-the-uswar-department-has-evolved-into-amilitary-behemoth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/?p=6757","title":{"rendered":"Over the past two centuries, the US\u201cWar Department\u201d has evolved into a\u201cMilitary behemoth\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Editor&#8217;s Note: President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order at the White House to change the name of the Defense Department back to its historical title of \u201cDepartment of war.\u201d. The White House said the\u201cDepartment of war\u201d was better at conveying\u201cA message of readiness and determination\u201d than the\u201cDepartment of Defense\u201d. The\u201cWar Department\u201d of the United States today is far from the\u201cWar Department\u201d of the past. The\u201cWar Department\u201d, founded in 1789, was initially small, even commanding only the army. Over the next 200 years, the \u201cMinistry of War\u201d evolved through continuous reform and expansion into the \u201cNational military establishment\u201d, the \u201cMinistry of Defence\u201d and now the \u201cSuper Military\u2013industrial complex\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6758\" title=\"ecb7695203fa19c703b2a6130ef6de5c\" src=\"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ecb7695203fa19c703b2a6130ef6de5c.jpg\" alt=\"ecb7695203fa19c703b2a6130ef6de5c\" width=\"1260\" height=\"661\" srcset=\"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ecb7695203fa19c703b2a6130ef6de5c.jpg 1260w, http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ecb7695203fa19c703b2a6130ef6de5c-300x157.jpg 300w, http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ecb7695203fa19c703b2a6130ef6de5c-1024x537.jpg 1024w, http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ecb7695203fa19c703b2a6130ef6de5c-768x403.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1260px) 100vw, 1260px\" \/><br \/>\nIn 1917, the U. S. War Department was housed in this building.<\/p>\n<p>The War Department was the War Department<\/p>\n<p>After the establishment of the federal government in 1789, the first Congress recognized the Department of War as a branch of the federal government, and the Secretary of war became a member of the President&#8217;s cabinet.<\/p>\n<p>Although the war department&#8217;s name sounded \u201cOffensive,\u201d it didn&#8217;t have much authority &#8212; 1798 the U.S. Congress to separate navy-related matters from the War Department, an independent admiralty was established, and the war department became essentially the\u201cWar Department\u201d for the army. Because the founders of the United States lived through the British colonial period, they saw the army as a\u201cTool of tyranny\u201d that would pose a mortal threat to the new republic, especially if it was stationed at home, there is a risk of overthrowing the elected government, so\u201cThe size and power of the army must be severely limited\u201d. As a result, Congress reviews army appropriations every two years to ensure absolute control over the army. The War Department was small at the time.<\/p>\n<p>Because of the\u201cNatural fear and hostility\u201d of the U. S. Congress to the army, the size of the U. S. Army fluctuated sharply with the outbreak and end of the war, showing a\u201cWartime expansion, post-war significantly reduced\u201d phenomenon. After the outbreak of the second american- War in 1812, for example, the size of the regular army of the United States Army expanded to more than 35,000 men, but immediately after the war the army was significantly reduced to about 10,000 men.<\/p>\n<p>After the independence of the United States carried out a series of expansionary military operations, the United States Department of war deeply involved, but because the United States Army has been\u201cRepeatedly downsized,\u201d not much development. During the us-mexico War of 1846-48, the War Department orchestrated the US invasion of Mexico, forcing Mexico to cede large areas of land, but it lacked experience in organizing large-scale military operations, it led to\u201cAn inefficient and chaotic logistical disaster\u201d in which thousands of US soldiers died not from combat but from disease and malnutrition.<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, the Navy, which was then a breakaway from the U.S. War Department, was used primarily to protect and expand U.S. interests abroad, and was thus favored by Congress for more development opportunities. The difference in professionalism and capability between the U. S. Army and navy was evident during the spanish-american War of 1898. The US Navy destroyed the Spanish Navy&#8217;s two main fleets with little loss of Battle of Manila Bay and naval battles in San Diego. The performance of the US War Department during this period paled in comparison. Before the war, the standing army of the US Army had only 28,000 personnel. The War Department mobilized more than 200,000 personnel in an emergency, resulting in the complete collapse of the logistics system, the soldiers were short of tents, guns, food and medical supplies, and the army eventually suffered severe non-combat attrition.<\/p>\n<p>However, no matter what the performance of the Army, the United States through the spanish-american War, gained control of Cuba, the Philippines, Puerto Rico and other places, as an imperialist power officially onto the stage of world hegemony.<\/p>\n<p>The United States found that to expand abroad, it needed not only a strong navy but also a strong enough army. With the intention of plundering overseas resources, the United States Congress changed its attitude and wanted to have a standing army of sufficient size. Therefore, it pushed for the reform of the War Department and the improvement of the conscription and logistics system to prepare for future wars.<\/p>\n<p>Unstable\u201cState military institutions\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the process of U. S. foreign expansion, the U. S. Army and Navy for the benefit of the service, the fight for funding, the U. S. Army and Navy are increasingly divided. During World War II, the United States military as a whole expended more manpower and material resources than expected due to a lack of coordination and cooperation. Learning from the lessons of World War II, the United States pushed for the integration of the War Department and the Admiralty after the war, with the aim of creating a modern military system capable of\u201cJoint operations.\u201d. In late 1945, President Truman submitted proposals to Congress for a unified \u201cNational military agency\u201d that would bring the War Department and the Navy under one civilian head.<\/p>\n<p>At the time, however, the United States Army Air Forces was planning to secede from the Army and become an independent American Air Force. After dropping two atomic bombs on the Japanese at the end of the Second World War, the United States Army Air Forces had \u201cEnormous confidence\u201d in their ability to strike, adding that \u201cThe huge fleet of the US Navy and the traditional army are out of date\u201d. This attitude has stimulated the US Navy, which has been\u201cFavoured by Congress\u201d, to open up its internal conflicts through congressional hearings and public debate in the media.<\/p>\n<p>After nearly two years of heated arguments and games, the United States still passed the relevant legislation, but made some compromises on the content. In 1947, Truman signed the National Security Act, the same year the \u201cNational Military Establishment\u201d was established &#8212; the independence of the United States Air Force, retaining the department of the Navy and the Department of the Army (formerly the War Department) , the three services were brought together under the command of the \u201cNational Military Establishment\u201d, headed by Foreste. But Foreste has little real power. He is more of a \u201cFacilitator\u201d than a \u201cCommander\u201d, with ministers retaining cabinet seats and the right to appeal directly to the president.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6759\" title=\"26b2b71ad3efc15b656c74e277298fc3\" src=\"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/26b2b71ad3efc15b656c74e277298fc3.jpg\" alt=\"26b2b71ad3efc15b656c74e277298fc3\" width=\"1260\" height=\"1011\" srcset=\"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/26b2b71ad3efc15b656c74e277298fc3.jpg 1260w, http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/26b2b71ad3efc15b656c74e277298fc3-300x241.jpg 300w, http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/26b2b71ad3efc15b656c74e277298fc3-1024x822.jpg 1024w, http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/26b2b71ad3efc15b656c74e277298fc3-768x616.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1260px) 100vw, 1260px\" \/><br \/>\nForeste&#8217;s inauguration in 1947<\/p>\n<p>The admiral&#8217;s rebellion gave birth to the\u201cReal\u201d defense department<\/p>\n<p>The signing of the National Security Act of 1947 did not represent the end of infighting among the various branches of the United States military because of the establishment of the new system and the opening of the Cold War in 1947, the US military services have entered a new, fiercer and more public struggle, leaving Foreste, who lacks real power, in an awkward position.<\/p>\n<p>Foreste, a former United States Navy and then a secretary, is considered a \u201cNavy man\u201d, but in trying to mediate between the Air Force and the Navy, former Navy colleagues accused him of\u201cBetraying\u201d the navy; Truman accused him of\u201cFavoring the navy.\u201d. In March 1949, Truman was not satisfied with Foreste&#8217;s work and decided to replace Foreste with Louis Johnson. It was a shock to Foreste, who was hospitalized for a nervous breakdown and committed suicide in a mental hospital in May 1949. In August 1949, the\u201cState military agency\u201d was renamed the\u201cMinistry of Defense.\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The new director, Johnson, abruptly canceled the construction of the USS United States without consulting the navy fully. This greatly stimulated the navy, the U. S. Navy top generals launched an open, organized counter-attack campaign. At congressional hearings in October 1949, the top brass of the U.S. Navy prepared ample material for an open challenge by navy-leaning lawmakers to Johnson and the Air Force, accusing the air force secretary and Johnson of having an improper interest in the air force&#8217;s aircraft manufacturers, the Air Force&#8217;s new bombers were criticised for being \u201cOutdated in design\u201d. The navy even fabricated false material to discredit the air force and distributed it to the media. As the situation spiraled out of control, Truman ordered more than a dozen senior admirals to\u201cEarly retirement,\u201d and nearly 200 were removed from their posts, ended in a complete defeat for the Navy.<\/p>\n<p>The infighting also exposed the defense secretary&#8217;s inability to control a powerful service, so in 1949 the United States passed an amendment to the national security law that removed the secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force from the cabinet, the need to report to the Secretary of Defense, who became the sole member of the Cabinet representing the United States Armed Forces, was greatly enhanced.<\/p>\n<p>A Military\u2013industrial complex always finds a new threat<\/p>\n<p>The official birth of the US Department of Defense ended the vicious competition between the various branches of the US military, but spawned a \u201cDemon\u201d&#8211; the Military\u2013industrial complex. The advent of a unified department of Defense meant a stable, large\u201cSuper-client\u201d with unprecedented demand and budget. Especially during the Cold War, the United States had to maintain a large military and an equally large industrial system specializing in weapons development and production throughout the years.<\/p>\n<p>In a televised farewell address to the nation in January 1961, then-president Eisenhower explicitly reminded the nation that \u201cWe must prevent Military\u2013industrial complex from gaining undue influence, intentionally or unintentionally.\u201d. But Eisenhower&#8217;s warning was in vain. Defence spending soared during the Vietnam War, and the military-industrial complex supplied the army with everything from rifles to helicopters to bombers, the longevity of the Vietnam War allowed these military-industrial companies to make steady and huge profits, which in turn pushed the U.S. Department of Defense to further prolong the war, despite the fact that in the latter part of the Vietnam War, the war was clearly not going well for the United States, there has also been a U-turn at home, but the Vietnam war is still hard to\u201cEnd\u201d. In the 1980s, the Pentagon and intelligence agencies supported proxy wars around the world on the grounds that they posed a threat to U.S. national security, designed to create a rationale and market for continued military assistance and intervention.<\/p>\n<p>Since then, whenever the \u201cThreat to America\u201d has disappeared, Military\u2013industrial complex have \u201cIdentified new threats\u201d that justify large defence spending and large military structures. After entering the 21st century, the US Department of Defense was further expanded into a\u201cSuper giant\u201d, especially after the\u201c9 \u00b7 11\u201d incident, under the banner of the\u201cAnti-terrorism\u201d war, the U. S. Defense budget has begun a new round of explosive growth.<\/p>\n<p>Donald Trump has now renamed the \u201cDepartment of Defense\u201d the \u201cDepartment of war,\u201d but this \u201cDepartment of war\u201d is far from the \u201cDepartment of war,\u201d nor does it imply a return to the second world war or even earlier. The United States has become accustomed to maintaining hundreds of military bases around the world under the influence of military-industrial interests, even though it is extremely expensive to construct such a\u201cGlobal power projection.\u201d But any contraction would be attacked at home as\u201cUndermining American leadership\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Editor&#8217;s Note: President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order at the White House to change the name of the Defense Department back to its historical title of \u201cDepartment of&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6758,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[266,257],"tags":[3366,3367,3368,3365],"views":259,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6757"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6757"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6757\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6760,"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6757\/revisions\/6760"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6758"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6757"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6757"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/forefrontnews.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}